The Stylistic Analysis of “the Supreme Illusion” by Arnold Bennette

The rhetorical Analysis of The Supreme Illusion by Arnold Bennette Id comparable to speculate upon Arnold Bennette and one of his works. Arnorld Bennette is a British novelist, playw correct, critic, essayist and journalist. His first make novel was The Man From The North. This was followed by Anna of The fiver Towns, The Old Wives Tale, Clayhanger, The Card and Hilda Lessways. Bennette is assign with more than 80 books and during the 1920s was considered among the leaders of English literature.And now Id like to analyse a tragic tale from The Matodor of the Five Towns which is called The Supreme Illusion. As for the title, its a topical one. This text is most one of mans dis incantations and this suitable title helps us to envision the contents of the story, which deals with such themes as art, theatre and famous people and their well-to-do ambitions. According to its form, its a short story in 2 parts. A narrator comes to Paris for the production of Notre-Dame de la Lune a lone at the hotel an ugly womanhood upsets his arrival.He meets his friend Minor Boissy and they talk active Minors c areeras a playwright. Boissy tells slightly his leading actress Blanche and the narrator believes that shes a young and pretty woman but in item Blanche is just that woman whom he met having arrived at the hotel. In the plot mental synthesis t presents exposition where we make the acquaintance of the characters and Minor tells about his life and Blanche finish, where the narrator expects Blanche to be magnificent, and denouement his disappointment.It seems to me that the message of the story smoke be formulated as a proverb If you want no disappointment, dont indulge in illusions The author uses some stylistic means to create the atmosphere and to convey it to the indorser flashback- to explain the reader the reason of the narrators state of excited annoyance here we can see a immense number of public figures describing French hotels (reasonable micro hot el, haughtily-managed hotels, a magnificent porter) detachments (humiliated and helpless, her eyes were hard-hard) and parantheses (which we all know, and whose name we all prey in confidence to all our friends).The narrators annoyance is showed purge with the help of elliptical sentences (But no ) and it also should be noted that they are with exclamatory marks. Later the narrator calms down and to prove it the author uses antithesis (a abrasive excitement changes into an agreeable one). The author uses direct and indirect methods of characterization to sop up his characters, thats why we can judge about his attitude to them done his descriptions.To show how unpleasant and stout the woman is numerous epithets are name (barbaric and repulsive creature, offensive hag, odious creature), climax (a savagely-dressed, ugly and ageing woman) simile (her automobile as large as a railway carriage) sexual inversion (pretty she could never have been) and of course irony (if she had bee n young and pretty, she would have had the right to be rude and domineering). But for Boissy Minor shes different he admires her, he endlessly desires to satisfy her ambitions.Shes the sense of his life (its proved by anadiplosis its the woman, its the woman who.. ) but hes a rather realistic person (Dont expect too much) despite hes a openhanded and wealthy man (metonymy all the walls of Paris were shouting his name climax Octave Boissy was a very wealthy man, he even looked a very wealthy man metaphor one of the darlings of success epithet of an absurdly luxurious civilazation).Hes unpretentious and always says solely (the fact is Im neurasthenic) although his disease hurts him (epithet a morbid inconsistency of walking) and usage of exclamatory sentences (I couldnt.. I couldnt.. ) but he tries to show it (antithesis at once comic and tragic smile) as he laughs a lot. By his own words he explains his choice. Theres a great number of anadiploses (its not a question.. , that was my sole reason.. , its the woman, his life consisted in one thing only) I like Arnold Bennettes style of writing.It goes without saying that his language is stylistically coloured, he perfectly mixes formal, light and harsh words (offensive hag, to deign, monstrosities, barbaric creature). Sometimes they are useful to persuade the narrators disgust , sometimes delight but always to intensify desired effect. The topis of this story is vital and actual and upon the theme of illusion and its aftermath weve speculated last time talking about the John Boyton Priestleys play entitled The Dangerous Corner.