Figurative Language

Stephany Vielman March 12, 2013 Prophets and poetic Language Jeremiah was a prophet cal conduct upon by God at a rattling young age to do His work. Jeremiah communicate against those who disobeyed God and spoke on the consequences of sin. He had a actually hard job of nerve-racking to incur the people of God to obey Him once again and to cleave them to stop sinning against Him. Jeremiah use upd figurative language to tell stories and to inform to the people what was going to happen if they continued to sin.What is the difference between a figurative and a literal analogy?The indwelling imagery that Jeremiah uses muckle be seen as useful in getting his point across to the disobedient people because he used it to paint a chilling picture of how God would devour the people, save he was also equal to(p) to paint a peaceful picture of how he was like a lamb all while using things that were relevant and ordinary to them so that it made sense to them.In Jeremiah 514 we see na ture organism used figuratively as a force of destruction, Because they take verbalize this word, I am now making my words in your sing a fire, and this people wood, and the fire shall devour them. God is very manifest here and you have no doubt in what he wants to do to the people. He uses very simple forces of nature that are relevant and cognize to the people. You know that God is upset because he uses the word devour, where as He could have used burn, but the word itself shows the force He is voluntary to strike with. Fire and wood are elements that are known and when shed together we know what happens, so it was useful to rank these together so that the people can see how great God is. The fire is not even Gods own actions, but His words put into Jeremiahs mouth, so it leaves you to imagine and wonder what would happen if it was coming like a shot from God, without an intermediate. The book of Jeremiah is filled with terrifying figurative language of destruction and oddment so it is hard to find a imperative example of natural imagery.In Jeremiah 1119, Jeremiah compares himself to a lamb and a manoeuver with fruit, which is a very nice choice for natural imagery, but what is said to be through against the lamb is terrifying, But I was a gentle lamb led to the slaughter, And I did not know it was against me that the devised schemes, saying, Let us destroy the tree with fruit, let us deracination him off from the land of the living, so that his recognize will no longer be remembered The choice of the lamb is positive because lambs re little, cute, and pure, and do no harm. Lambs are led by shepherds, but as we know, they are also killed for food or for sacrifice. In this fount the lamb is led to be slaughtered, but just with the purpose of evil. Jeremiah is to be seen as obedient, pure, and holy since he obeys and follows God in every delegacy possible, but the people of tired of him so they plan to kill him. He is also compared to a tree with fruit because he has a lap to offer to the people, such as life.The imagery usage of with fruit is heavy because it shows the tree serves with purpose, just like Jeremiah. It also shows that that tree is alive and in good soil, and instead of its fruit be eaten, the people will cut it off. Jeremiahs job was already difficult as it was and it was necessary for him to use figurative language as a prophetic tool to get his message across to the people. I see it as effective because any(prenominal) people need to hear and see things in a contrasting perspective that includes images of things that are relevant to them.The people would have listened less if Jeremiah would have spoken in prophetic language. The usage of nature is also very effective because it was a part of everyday life for them fire, wind, trees, lambs, etc. on that point could be possible dangers involving imagery, such as someone not record the concept because they were thrown off by the comparison or organ ism distracted by it as well, but Jeremiah used it well.