Atkins V Virginia

1 Criminal Justice 222 23 June 2012 The hook suit Atkins vs. Virginia is discussing the let go that ment every last(predicate)y decelerate people macrocosm rewarded the death penalty. The watchword is that, are they capable of knowing the conflict between redress and wrong? When people are retard does it affect their ethical motive and the way they look at situations? Does it affect the decisions they make and does it bushel the control they have on their emotions? Are their impulses clouded? Or could it be that people dally as mental retards near to get slack? This court cuticle was a major(ip) move in figuring erupt the decision in these type of cases dealing with mentally retarded people. This June 20th , 2002 case was a landmark decision by the US overbearing Court in reversing a agent statutes founded in the case of Penry v. Lynaugh in 1889. The issue of the instruction execution of mentally challenged individuals was first address in the case of Penry v Lynaugh in 1889. In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court govern that the execution of mentally challenged individuals is not a violation of the one-eighth Amendment. The APA found that there were two principle reasons that led to this decision. (1) the disabilities that companion mental deceleration are directly relevant to the iniquitous responsibility and select of punishment, and (2) the degree of reduction in honorable blameworthiness act by a defendants mental slowing renders imposition of the death penalty unconstitutional (www.deathpenaltyinfo.org ) Even though Georgia and Massachusetts banned the execution of the mentally challenged at the time, the court found that not profuse states had formed a national consensus on the matter. Exactly how did all this come or so? What ! Cates 2 led up to this Supreme Court landmark retroversion? Approximately midnight in August 16, 1996, Atkins and...If you want to get a full essay, secern it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper