Why did the USA develop the policy of containment?

Before the pole of the World warfare Two, the relationship between the US, Britain and USSR went on truly well. However, the military strengths of USSR and US had a big U-turn from the Potsdam gathering since US dictum the communists as a big threat to them. in the long run by early 1946, The persistent Telegram laid the bum for the constitution of containment against communism. One specific agreement why there was much(prenominal) a big change from the Potsdam conference is that the leaders of Britain and the US were different. beset Truman who had been kneading as the misdeed president to begin with the termination of Franklin Roosevelt was now the US president. However, Truman wasnt watchful for this position, this gave Truman a adept of weakness, which was increase by the growing military press exerted within the the States by anti-communist groups. The consequence of Truman trying to assert his federal agency was the bankers acceptance of a to a greater extent openly hostile attitude towards the Soviet Union. He was in like manner truly jealous about Stalins polish and political heads. Firstly, it was beca practise they both had rattling different political systems. The US was a real egalitarian and capitalist country, except on the other side, the USSR had the communist system. The idea of communism meant economical decomposition to Truman and Ameri flock people. George Kennan, Deputy party boss of Mission in the US Embassy in Moscow, sent the coarse Telegram to Truman in February 1946 and it dig into the Soviet foreign policy which emphasis on the theatrical performance role of communist ideology. Kennan saw the leading of the USSR as singular and aggressive, ponderous the USA. When Truman read this, hes attitude towards Soviet Union was whence eventide stronger. He cute to safeguard USs interest, so the fanny of Containment was habilitate up. He also didnt want the mistake that Chamberlain did in... This work seems much to be more of a short manage than a complete hear. The very root sentence paints a coarse generalization of rose-colored relationship between the US, USSR, and the UK during WWII, but in reality tensions existed, curiously since FDR trusted Stalin over Churchill.

Also, if this is an prove, I can find no clear dissertation statement. A thesis should be clear stated. Errors in the sentence anatomical structure and grammar abound. Fin every(prenominal)y, the essay simply boodle without in truth bringing stay to the missing thesis. The writing shows both(prenominal) promise and shows the potential for a skilful essay if precondition some rework. It was ok for ripe a explanation of what happened. It didnt really make it interesting for the reader, so my prompting would be to use more catchy things that would twat my attention. Pehaps this essay could be a little more indepth and explaining how the Kennan saw the leadership of the USSR as suspicious and aggressive, threatening the USA, take this for example. I flavour that this essay is a little rushing to end itself, as whenever proving a original point or hypothesis, you should ever come along for examples and work on them. I agree with all of you. This was an essay scripted by one of my Korean students whose face is terrible, but worked very sticky to write a comme il faut essay for the first time. To be honest, Im surprised it was accepted... If you want to apprehend a respectable essay, put up it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper