Puerto Rico and U.S. Presidential Elections

Voters in Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories are not permitted to vote in the presidential election under the provisions set forth in the Electoral College. But they do have a say in who gets to the White House. Thats because voters in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa are permitted to participate in the presidential primary and are granted delegates by the two major political parties. In other words, Puerto Rico and the other U.S. territories get to help nominate the presidential candidates. But voters there cannot actually participate in the election itself because of the Electoral College system. Can Puerto Ricans Vote? Why cant voters in Puerto Rico and the other U.S. territories help elect the President of the United States? Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution makes it clear that only states can participate in the electoral process. Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress, the U.S. Constitution reads. The Office of the Federal Register, which oversees the Electoral College, states: The Electoral College system does not provide for residents of U.S. Territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands) to vote for President. The only way citizens of the U.S. territories can participate in the presidential elections is if they have official residency in the United States and vote by absentee ballot or travel to their state to vote. This â€Å"disenfranchisement† or denial of the right to vote in national elections — including presidential elections — also applies to U.S. citizens residing in Puerto Rico or any of the other U.S. unincorporated territories. Although the committees of both the Republican party and Democratic party in Puerto Rico select voting delegates to the parties’ national presidential nominating conventions and state presidential primaries or caucuses, U.S. citizens living in Puerto Rico or the other territories cannot vote in federal elections unless they also maintain a legal voting residence in one of the 50 states or in the District of Columbia. Puerto Rico and the Primary Even though voters in Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories cant vote in the November election, the Democratic and Republican parties allow them to select delegates to represent them at the nominating conventions. The national Democratic partys charter, enacted in 1974, states that Puerto Rico shall be treated as a state containing the appropriate number of Congressional Districts. The Republican party also allows voters in Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories to participate in the nomination process. In the 2008 Democratic presidential primary, Puerto Rico had 55 delegates — more than Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, D.C., West Virginia, Wyoming, and several other states with populations lesser than the U.S. territorys 4 million. Four Democratic delegates went to Guam, while three went to the Virgin Islands and American Samoa each. In the Republican presidential primary of 2008, Puerto Rico had 20 delegates. Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands each had six. What are the US Territories? A territory is an area of  land that is administered by the United States government but not officially claimed by any of the 50 states or any other world nation. Most depend on the United States for defense and economic support. Puerto Rico, for example, is a commonwealth — a self-governed, unincorporated territory of the United States. Its residents are subject to U.S. laws and pay income taxes to the U.S. government. The United States currently has 16 territories, of which only five are permanently inhabited: Puerto Rico, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa. Classified as unincorporated territories, they are organized, self-governing territories with governors and territorial legislatures elected by the people. Each of the five permanently inhabited territories may also elect a non-voting â€Å"delegate† or â€Å"resident commissioner† to the U.S. House of Representatives. The territorial resident commissioners or delegates function in the same way as members of Congress from the 50 states, except they are not allowed to vote on the final disposition of legislation on the House floor. However, they are allowed to serve on congressional committees and receive the same annual salary as other rank-and-file members of Congress. Sources Frequently Asked Questions. U.S. Electoral College, Office of the Federal Register, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, D.C. Section 1. Article II, Executive Branch, Constitution Center. The Democratic National Committee. The Charter the Bylaws of the Democratic Party of the United States. DNC Services Corporation, August 25, 2018.

Julius Caesar Character Analysis - 1546 Words

Having trust is a great quality to have, but sometimes there might be one person that takes advantage of that trait. For example, once they start trusting people too easily they might, or will, start taking advantage of them. In one of Shakespeare’s plays, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, it demonstrates that being too trusting of someone could end with bad consequences. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, one of the main characters, Brutus, trusted his best friend, Cassius, with everything. Brutus trusted that Cassius was right about him being a new ruler of Rome, how killing Caesar would make a safer and better living space for the community, and that the people would support Brutus while he was leading. Cassius saw that Brutus trusted him. He†¦show more content†¦One time Caesar dared Cassius to dive into the Tiber river and to race him to a certain point. Then Caesar cried out to Cassius that he needed help, otherwise he would drown. Then Cassius went to help him. This quote explains how Brutus can be too trusting because Cassius was telling him that he would be a much greater leader than Caesar. He tricked him into killing Caesar for â€Å"Rome’s sake†, while Cassius just wanted Caesar dead because he disliked him. This shows that it leads to Brutus’ downfall by Cassius saying that Brutus would be a much better leader, Cassius tricked him which lead to the whole downfall of Brutus killing himself Near the end of the play Brutus is kind of realizing that Cassius is not acting the way he usually is. He notices that Cassius really wants to kill Caesar.â€Å"That you do love me, I am nothing jealous; / What you would work me to, I have some aim; / How I have thought of this, and these times, / I shall recount hereafter. For this present, / I would not so (with love I might entreat you) / Be any further moved. What you have said / I will consider; what you have to say / I will patience hear, and find a time / Both meet to hear and answer such high things;† (1.2.162-170). This quote is saying that Brutus knows that Cassius loves him, He does not doubting what Cassius would do for him. Brutus has some idea of what Cassius is saying on what to do with Caesar. He willShow MoreRelatedCharacter Analysis of Julius Caesar1421 Words   |  6 PagesJulius Caesar Character Analysis Cassius Strengths and Weaknesses Cassius was one of the conspirators against Cesar and proves to be a powerful character in Shakespeares, Julius Caesar. He has much strength and very few weaknesses and this helped him achieve small goals that led to his main goal of killing Caesar. One of Cassius strengths is his ability to influence people using flattery and pressure. In Act 1, Scene 2, Cassius demonstrates this strength by influencing Brutus to think moreRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis Essay1017 Words   |  5 Pages The author of Julius Caesar is William Shakespeare, an English poet, playwright, and actor, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He was born on July 13 in 1564 and died in 1616. It was written to be a tragedy and was one of the seventh plays written off true events that happened in Roman time. Also includes Coriolanus, Antony, and Cleopatra. Drama of the play focuses on Brutus’ struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism, and friendship. Opens with â€Å"twoRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis1332 Words   |  6 PagesBrutus’s Wife Of all female characters in Shakespeare, few possess the vigor and assertion that Portia demonstrates in Shakespeare’s classic political tragedy, Julius Caesar. Overshadowed by all of the chaos and unrest in the life of our protagonist, Brutus, a complex emotional and ethical journey is taking place, represented by Portia, Brutus’s wife. Portia exists in the text to shed light and understanding on an arch that isn’t always as apparent to the audience. In production of the play, directorsRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis899 Words   |  4 PagesApparently, the North Star is also a pincushion. William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, is about the assassination of the titular future king and the aftermath of this event. Julius Caesar was loved by all the common people but hated by the aristocracy. Many characters in this play end up dying due to this event. Many of them had thought themselves immortal. As a genius playwright, Shakespeare was able t o include hidden messages in his plays. In this specific play, he was able to demonstrateRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis852 Words   |  4 Pagesdislike people. In this play, Julius Caesar, there were many different characters with many different personalities. I believe that Soothsayer is the most honorable character, and I believe that Brutus is the most corrupt. I believe that Soothsayer is the most honorable character for multiple reasons. One reason I believe this is because he tried to warn Caesar two times about the Ides of March. Caesar marked him as unimportant, and he ignored Soothsayer. Despite Caesar saying he was unimportant, heRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis785 Words   |  4 Pageslanguage† (Keach 253). In the play Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare uses metals to add emphasis to the play. These references to metal are used in the play as a form of characterization, as a way to establish the mood, and as a way to explain the ideas of the characters. The characterization helps the audience to have a better understanding of the characters and their personalities, the mood further explains what the characters are feeling in relation to Caesar and his death, and they emphasizeRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis842 Words   |  4 PagesWhen it comes down to identifying true friends, not everyone will show loya lty in the same way. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus and Antony have flaws and varying beliefs which led them down different paths, as well as individual ways of displaying this ardent behavior. Everyone has different faults or quirks that can get in the way and cause us to do some pretty hurtful things. But Shakespeare shows us that although these flaws produce bad outcomes, they might have more positiveRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis2014 Words   |  9 PagesJulius Caesar is a play about the death of Julius Caesar and how his death affects the Roman Empire. The play was written in 1599 by William Shakespeare. Even though the play is about Julius Caesar, the main character isn’t Julius Caesar, but really is Brutus. Brutus deals with internal conflict during the play because at first he doesn’t want to cause any harm to his emperor but Cassius convinces him that the other senators and he should do something about Caesar. Cassius is a nother senator forRead MoreJulius Caesar Character Analysis Essay834 Words   |  4 Pageswas once a friend that ended up costing someone’s life. In the play Julius Caesar the entire situation gets out of hand, Caesar had still thought his true friend, Cassius, was loyal to him. Cassius is to be known of betraying, his once good friend, Caesar. Even someone as loyal as one may think, everyone’s potential can be unexpected and hazardous. The situation gets even more out of control as Cassius decided to deceive Caesar, only then to hurt him in the end. Cassius appears to be a threat, althoughRead More Brutus Character Analysis in Shakespeares Tragedy of Julius Caesar964 Words   |  4 PagesCharacter Analysis: Brutus William Shakespeares play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, was mainly based on the assassination of Julius Caesar. The character who was the mastermind behind the assassination was, ironically, Marcus Brutus, a senator and close friend to Julius Caesar. But what would cause a person to kill a close friend? After I examined Brutus relationship towards Caesar, his involvement in the conspiracy and his importance to the plot it all became clear. Brutus had one particular

Changing To Fit The Times Essay Example For Students

Changing To Fit The Times? Essay Introductions of new ideas into different cultures happens all the time. Some examples are in Africa people trying to introduce new technologies to the people there to improve the lives of the people there. Another example is how the McDonalds company is sprouting new franchises in countries all over the world. The idea of new technologies being introduced to people who need them is a wonderful idea, although the idea of a new restaurants may not be. In this paper I will discuss how the introduction of new ideas into other parts of the world is not for the good of all. This new thing can change the cultures of the people who live there, the way they lived may be drastically altered or disrupted. What ultimately should be done, is a vote for majority to determine whether the people in these areas being affected by the new ideas, want them. Using the Frye model, Angell proposes in her essay, and using it to determine how and whether new ideas should enter existing cultures. If the situ ation arises where cultures are being changed by new ideas, such as fast food restaurants in foreign countries and biotechnology where organic farmers live, there should be a certain amount of respect to the existing ways of live. The way people lived before the new technology or new cultures was there first, so there is a level of respect to the way it used to be. Although, the new ways may help or improve the old ones. These new ideas should be agreed upon by the people effected by the new ideas. This is where Angell and her Frye model fit in. The idea of a consensus upon the idea presented is the better way to go for determining an idea that will affect a large group of people. In Schlosser, McDonalds are popping up everywhere on the planet, a consensus should be taken to determine whether or not the people in the area where McDonalds is thinking of locating, wants them. Also in Pollans essay biotechnology is the big culprit, the Monsanto company is producing and taking over the potato growing industry and people who buy the potatoes are not given a choice of if they want organic or enhanced. The people in the problem areas are not given a choice of what they want, because they are forced to take what is given, we must find ways to determine the fate or these people. Angell brings forth two models for which to help solve problems; the Daubert and Frye models. The Daubert model says the decision is the given by one person with supreme power. Angell discusses these people as gatekeepers who decide upon a solution. This person holds sole responsibility for the entire population under his power. This idea can not work with the problems demonstrated, the rights or opinions of all can not be relied upon by just one person. This one person could not possibly make a worthy decision for all the people he speaks for, everyone would have a different view, opinion, idea or criticism. Although the Frye model suggested does make more sense in the cases of Pollan and Schlosser. The Frye model proposes a consensus of all being affected. An excerpt from Angell the court refused to admit it, on the grounds that there was not yet a scientific consensus about it, helps demonstrate the effect a consensus can have. This example talks of a jury in a court case not allo wing a lie detector test to be admitted because it was not well known yet, so the majority voted on the idea to not allow it to enter the court. This is the better model to use for both Schlosser and Pollans problems. .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 , .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .postImageUrl , .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 , .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396:hover , .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396:visited , .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396:active { border:0!important; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396:active , .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396 .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u93769c82e642891aa6ed71c95fdf7396:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Shooting the Hippo ( a book review) EssaySchlosser announces a problem with McDonald restaurants effecting local cultures. He says McDonalds restaurants are stationing themselves all over the globe. So much so that he states Ernst Doerfter, a prominent member of the doomed East Germen parliament, who called for an official ban on McDonalds and similar abnormal garbage-makers (Schlosser 480). The quote shows just how much McDonalds is trying to associate themselves with every country. East Germany was bothered so much by fast food places that they called for a ban on them. Schlosser allows the reader to understand this more by his statement of the traditional German restaur ant serving schnitzel, bratwurst, knockwurst, sauerbraten, and large quantities of beer is rapidly disappearing in Germany (Schlosser 483). Schlosser depicts the new McDonalds idea has put the traditional ideas of Germany out the window by this quote. This is where the Frye model can be used to help the community. The people in the areas being taken over by McDonalds could meet in a common place and vote on the decision to allow them to build or not. In doing this, everyone is heard and has a chance to voice their opinion, no one is left in the dark and has their very own chance to stop or allow what they wish. The Daubert model would not work as well because one individual would be the determingin factor of whether or not McDonalds was allowed to build. How could one single person speak for the whole and give equal representation? Also, influences from the outside may help the gatekeeper to make his decisions more easily, example could be the McDonalds or another restaurant paying the gatekeeper to allow them to do what they want. Why should an American idea such as McDonalds be forced upon groups of people in other countries who might not want them? I know if I were from another country I would rather eat my native food than eating the food of another country. One answer man be the owners of the McDonalds are trying to set new buildings all over to increase their flow of money much greater. They do not care about the people they harm or the cultures changed by their ways, this is evident because it is still happening all over the world. Schlosser is saying that McDonalds and other restaurants like it are intruding onto foreign grounds trying to make a foot hold in countries which they are non-existent. By intruding onto these foreign grounds, McDonalds is altering the cultures that existed before it. When new ways are forced upon people, they should be able to determine themselves whether or not they it to survive. People should not have things forced upon t hem if they do not want them. Pollan is affected by the influence of new ways by biotechnology creating new crops for farmers to grow. For example he cites the toxin produced by the New Leafs and the potential effect of the new crops to help insects become resistant, in return removing one of the farmers most crucial tools. Pollan states the widespread use of Bt in biotech crops is likely to lead to insect resistance, thus robbing organic growers of one of their most critical tools(Pollan 511). The biotech companies are introducing so much of the insecticide that evolution will take control and help the insects to survive what is killing them. A solution to this is to allow the farmers of both crops, organic and biotech, to meet and vote on whether biotechnology should be used, and if so how can it maintainor improve the situation under the gun. A common consensus is really the only realsolution to the problem, if a panel of people were to vote on the topic they would be farmers who do not like the members of the panel and would disagree with them. The same problem would arise if a single person were to decide the fate of biotech, people would not agree with his decision, and would probably do what they believed was better behind the laws back. The same problems and solutions would be in this example as the McDonalds in Germany example; people would be unhappy with a decision they feltthey did not take part in. If I were an organic farmer, and understood the problem that could arise I would like to put my two cents in and show others what may happen with resistance in insects. That is why the Frye model works better, everyone is allowed to make their own decision and take part in saving or improving their way of living. Another problems that arises from biotechnology is the failure to indicate on labels of the foods we eat. We as a consumer, have the right to know what we put into our bodies. As Pollan points out: The label on a bag of biotech potatoes in the supermarket will tell a consumerall about the nutrients they contain, even the trace amounts of copper. Yet it is silent about the fact that those potatoes are the products of genetics engineering but also about their containing an insecticide (Pollan 516)This just goes to show how the consumer is left in the dark about what they eat. This is a major problem, not knowing exactly what you are eating. Again, why should people be forced to adjust to something they might not wish to take part in. If I personally had a choice of eating a biotech product or an organic one, I would most defiantly go with the organic one. No public information has been emitted from the biotech companies to prove they are safe or what is exactly inside them. No consensus has been determined of whether people want to eat biotech plants or not, it is implied by the companies producing them, that everyone will want it. A common solution to this is show what is in the foods we eat, let people know exactly what t hey are eating. Dont let people be in a locked closet, all can be solved if some simple reasoning were put to use. .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 , .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .postImageUrl , .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 , .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397:hover , .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397:visited , .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397:active { border:0!important; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397:active , .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397 .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u57a72eb00cc4edd5d1fa54e24b9f0397:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Reader EssayAll three examples shown show how people are forced to come to terms with whatis influencing their lives. Using a common consensus or the Frye model proposed by Angell can help save cultures or ways of living. People shouldnt be forced to subdue to what is overpowering them, voice and opinion is needed for the success of all. Words/ Pages : 1,780 / 24

Intellectual Assets of Anheuser-Busch free essay sample

Intellectual Assets Anheuser-Busch has an abundance of intellectual assets, also known as intellectual capital. To begin, intellectual capital can be defined as â€Å"the total Knowledge within an organization that may be converted into value, or used to produce a higher value asset. The term embodies the knowledge and expertise of employees; brands; customer information and relationships; contracts; internal processes, methods, and technologies; and Intellectual property† (Prior, 2008). Breaking the term down even further we can divide intellectual capital into three components: human capital, structural capital, and relational capital (Zambon, 2002). The creation of human capital at Anheuser-Busch is a top priority. â€Å"When you become a part of our family, your input, ideas and insights are accepted and valued. Since 1852, we have invested human, technological and financial resources to ensure that Anheuser-Busch quality remains strong and true. We consistently think of newer, better, and/or bigger ways to improve our products, services and operations† (Anheuser Busch, 2008). We will write a custom essay sample on Intellectual Assets of Anheuser-Busch or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Anheuser-Busch offers an array of benefits including medical, dental, vision, prescription, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment, travel accident benefits, short and long term disability, retirement benefits, tuition reimbursement, employee assistance programs, work/family balance, liberal vacation and holiday packages, promote from within policies, tickets to Busch entertainment theme parks, use of fitness centers, and even complimentary beer with the thought that an outstanding place to work who offers great benefits will attract great human capital (Anheuser-Busch, 2008). One of Anheuser-Busch’s business units, Busch Entertainment Corporation, has a â€Å"leadership training program that employs a variety of exercises, assessments, and out-of-class assignments to teach the importance of and the keys to promoting service leadership† and â€Å"employees can enhance their skills through a 16-hour leadership training program delivered over three to four weeks, cross-training, team projects, participation in roundtable events, and visiting other parks for benchmarking† (AARP, 2008). Training rograms such as Anheuser-Busch’s create human capital. The second component of intellectual capital is structural capital. Structural capital can include such concepts as organizational processes, trademarks, laboratories and market intelligence, leadership, leaseholds, franchises, licenses, and patents. Anheuser-Busch’s most notable and profitable trademark is Budweiser. Budweiser is synonymous with Anheuser-Busch. Even if a person never heard of the Anheuser-Busch company they have almost certainly heard of the beer called Budweiser. The name is so prestigious that even today Anheuser-Busch still battles with â€Å"the Czech beer producer Budejovicky Budvar over the right to use the trademark name Budweiser on their products† and â€Å"Both the brews have a long history of existence. The disagreements over the right to use the trademark started in late 1870s, when the brewers began to export their like-named products to markets beyond their national borders† (Homolova, 2000). The ongoing fight proves that the name Budweiser is an extremely valuable intangible asset in itself. Anheuser-Busch also has very valuable licenses that are attributed to its intellectual capital. Most importantly Anheuser-Busch is licensed to sell its product all over the world which adds to its profitability. Other structural capitals attributed to Anheuser-Busch include an array of patents; their process for brewing beer and treating spent grains, step mashing process for producing low alcohol beer, and their process for filling beer into containers to name a few (Bioportfolio, 2008). The third component of intellectual capital is relational capital. Relational capital can include customer relationships, customer loyalty and satisfaction, distribution relationships and agreements, and relationships with other partners and other stakeholders. As noted on their website Anheuser-Busch strives to achieve great customer and distribution relationships. Some of Anheuser-Busch’s goals and values are to put quality in everything they do, to continually exceed customer expectations, and to enjoy trust respect and integrity in all of their relationships. By enjoying the title of being the largest brewing company in the Unites States, by volume, they have obviously exceeded customer expectations. These goals have helped Anheuser-Busch achieve great relational capital. Strategies In addition to Anheuser-Busch’s intellectual property they take part in formulating a wide array of business-level strategies, corporate-level strategies, international-level strategies, and entrepreneurial strategies. In regards to business-level strategies and overall cost leadership, Anheuser-Busch is the undeniable industry leader when it comes to beer sales. Even if Anheuser-Busch beers arent the cheapest, they still are bought for their quality and Anheuser-Busch has gained tremendous market share for this. As for their focus, Anheuser-Busch focuses on a broad segment of customers producing a variety of beers for a variety of budgets to suit all personalities needs. Their differentiation factor is that even though Anheuser-Busch produces such cheaper beers as Budweiser and Bud Light, they also produce premium, more expensive beers like Bare Knuckle Stout and Shock Top Belgian White. Anheuser-Busch produces over 100 different brands of beer and they are able to charge more for the specialty beers. In regards to Anheuser-Busch’s corporate-level strategies they have not only been successful in selling just beer, the company has been successful in adding business units to its name which include their very own packaging companies, recycling companies, and theme parks. All of these business units have been very successful for Anheuser-Busch. Anheuser-Busch is not only the United States largest brewing companies by volume, it is the worlds largest brewing company based on revenue. This in part is due to its international-level strategies. AB International operates 16 breweries – 14 in China, one in the United Kingdom and one in India† (Anheuser-Busch, 2008). Their most popular brand, Budweiser, is â€Å"is locally brewed in nine other countries outside the United States under the direct supervision of Anheuser-Busch brew masters. They are: Argentina, Canada, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Panama, Russia, South Korea and Spain† (Anheuser-Busch, 2008). Anheuser-Busch’s most recent entrepreneurial strategy may have just been its best ever. Anheuser-Busch has agreed to combine with InBev, the world’s second largest beer brewer, to become Anheuser-Busch InBev. The all-cash deal, for $70 a share, would create the world’s largest brewer, uniting the maker of Budweiser and Michelob with the producer of Stella Artois, Bass and Brahma. Together, the two companies would have sales of more than $36 billion a year, surpassing the current No. 1 brewer, SABMiller of London† (De la Merced, 2008). Anheuser-Busch is a household name. They are an industry leader and soon to be the world leader in brewing. Its intellectual assets have made it a profitable company and its organizational strategies have made it number one. I’m not sure that Anheuser-Busch should change any of its strategies.